Thursday, May 15, 2014

A Proud Moment for Program Carts

Congratulations to Rich Faron and Jessica Banda! Recently, Rich and Jessica had an article published in the Exhibitionist, a highly esteemed journal among museum professionals published by the National Association for Museum Exhibition.  Following the theme of this Spring edition, the article, “Exhibition Carts: Intentionally Designed Spaces on the Move,” explores the program cart as an intentionally designed space.  As the program carts are a favorite here at Museum Explorer, you can bet we are excited about this publication. You can read the full article below, but click this link to view it in its entirety on the official NAME website (pictures included)!  

The Cover of the Issue, "Spring 2014: Intentionally Designed Spaces"


Exhibition Carts: Intentionally Designed Spaces on the Move
By Rich Faron and Jessica Banda


The intentionality behind all design work is problem-solving. While many forms of design process exist, history and tradition reveal that until recently, the typical exhibit developer-engaged in efforts defined by hours of talking, researching, coffee clutching, sketching, pencil sharpening, mouse pushing, ceiling staring and wishful thinking—hoping for that “a-ha!” moment. Recently, though (and especially over the last 10 years), conscious advancements have been made to sharpen the lens of the overall design process by refocusing attention on  meeting audience needs and expectations with conscious intent.

The biggest changes have come about in the area of upfront investigation: the collecting and collating of data regarding the end user.
  • Who is the visitor?
  • What are visitor interests?
  • What do they care about?
  • What are their needs? 
  • What is the spatial context? 

This surge in audience research has transformed the once opaque process of exhibit design into something much more transparent, allowing designers to organize the entire process into four distinct steps - 1)Investigate & Analyze;  2)Concept & Test;  3)Revise & Design; and 4), Build & Implement.  In order to differentiate this approach from more traditional forms of design problem-solving, we now refer to the entire process as experience design.  And note that the word ‘experience’ replaces ‘exhibit’ here—not merely for buzz benefit, but because experience design indicates a greater possibility to approach design with some form of intent. Today, a more discriminating public is looking for both excitement and educational enrichment. The stakes are higher than ever for modern museums, zoos, and aquariums because every destination must be visitor-centered. The goal: be prepared to capture and hold the imagination of an always-evolving audience free to make choices: free to go elsewhere and free to do something different.

Carts as Intentionally Designed Spaces
Program carts are wonderful tools for responding to this increasing pressure facing exhibitors.  As a method of flexible program delivery, these carts provide activities that fulfill a variety of purposes, from conveying mission content, to serving as a changing marquee, to supporting local school curricula.  Because carts bring staff, objects, and an exhibit-like experience into direct contact with visitors, they provide an intimate and simple means for establishing and building a dialogue with the public.  As self-contained platforms, carts are spaces that are able to move throughout a facility in order to find people, deliver an experience, and start an open-ended face-to-face exchange.  Simply put, this new approach allows public programmers to intentionally develop, design and deliver customized experiences that are all at once interactive, compact, and mobile.

To realize intent, a simple set of three standard reference points or new tools have been developed that help keep the designer on track, offering a universal method for tinkering throughout the process no matter the museum, mission, or message. Our designers at Museum Explorer keep the following principles close at hand throughout the process of creating exhibition carts:

HEAD Target visitor interest. Give the audience something to wonder about.
 Develop and design a content highlight, some nugget of information that ignites
interest and invites direct exploration and inquiry. (Give people something to
THINK about).

HEART Appeal to visitor awareness. Define an intimate environment. Design
clear conduits that allow the audience to make a personal connection with the program
narrative. Discover a way to incorporate a center of awareness in every cart design. (Help
 people find something to CARE about).

HANDS Engage visitor curiosity. Welcome the audience to put their hands on things.
Merge visitor interactivity with the overall flow and story arch of the program. Create simple
and comfortable physical connections that stimulate natural human curiosity and encourage
discovery through sharing and conversation. (Give people something to DO).

As varied examples of how  intentionally designed program carts are created for various settings (an art museum, a history museum, and zoo), this article will discuss the following carts: “Art à la Cart,” “History à la Cart,” and
 “Animals Like Us,”

Carts Build Visitor Collaboration and Engagement: Smithsonian American Art Museum
The design process for program carts at the Smithsonian American Art Museum, was primarily a matter of shifting a perception about the nature of these carts. Jennifer Brundage, National Outreach Manager at the Smithsonian Institution, spoke to the concept of mobile learning centers in 2011.  In an entry for the Smithsonian’s Affiliate blog, Brundage confessed that she had “come to think of educational carts in the galleries as the Clydesdales of the field – the workhorses that are low-tech, straightforward” (2011).  Fortunately though, Brundage went on to admit that she was “wrong” about her initial notion of program carts, changing her mind after a 2011 brown bag lunch session where educators at the Smithsonian gathered for a presentation by guest speakers Rich Faron of Museum Explorer and Heidi Moisan from the Chicago History Museum regarding program carts—at the behest of Susan Nichols.  Brundage reflected afterward that, “through a slideshow of case studies and prototypes it became clear that their examples did not reflect the cart [she] had come to stereotype.”  Rather, “they presented carts as an appealing, active launch pad for visitor team-building, collaboration and a deeper engagement with exhibitions” (Brundage, March 22, 2011). 
As visitor collaboration is not something that often occurs in quiet art museums, bringing this object into the Smithsonian American Art Museum of all places was something of a novel idea.  The simple intent of moving a program cart (a box) into a gallery (four walls covered in expensive art), can be a challenge in such a conservative setting.  But the SAAM wanted direct and active visitor engagement, so Museum Explorer created “Art à la Cart”: five mobile carts for use throughout the Museum that further engage visitors with artwork by providing interactive hands-on activities for them.  Though all white in design with simple stark flags, these Art à la carts are still a colorful idea in such a prestigious setting. 

Carts Empower Visitors to Interact with History: Chicago History Museum


At the Chicago History Museum, program carts address a need for a very specific audience.  Here, history is not locked away in vaults or even behind glass (with some exceptions), but rather is made accessible to visitors—especially young local students—through inviting dialogue, opportunities to touch, and descriptive but relatable museum labels to provide a full historical experience.  Exhibition carts naturally fit into an environment like this, providing a different platform for making history accessible through direct visitor engagement. 
           
As part of the “History à la Cart” program, we designed multiple mobile learning carts for the museum, including “Prairie Landscape” and “The Great Chicago Fire.”  When Chicago Public School children come to learn about these locally-important moments in history, they actively implement their learning.  For example, they can physically measure how tall prairie grass was in order to visualize early Chicago, and they can map the path of the Great Chicago fire to assess the vast scope of the damage. 

According to Lynn McRainey, Director of Education at the Chicago History Museum, carts such as these “define a place where collaboration, conversations and children’s curiosity are a priority” (personal communication, December 2013).  In an environment where so many young students come to enhance their learning at school, the “History à la Cart” program at CHM provide spaces (six exhibition carts, to be precise) complimenting school curriculum.  Here, carts “empower children to move out of their passive roles of being told history into active participants in the discovery process”  (personal communication, December 19, 2013). 

Carts Encourage Exploration and Enable Visitors to Control their Experience: Lincoln Park Zoo
Allison Price, Director of Education at the Lincoln Park Zoo in Chicago, at first questioned program carts’ abilities to hold on to visitors.  The intentional design process proved its mettleon their program cart “Animals Like Us,” a collaborative effort with Museum Explorer Inc.  Through a series of probing questions and trial and error, Price and her team discovered that their typical “show and tell” program delivery was not working with audiences.  “[My team at Lincoln Park Zoo] kept coming back to our guest experience.  What should a visit to a cart feel like? What should guests be able to do?,” Price asked.  The answer to these questions was simple.  They deduced that “guests should be able to explore the animal kingdom on their own terms,” and should “walk away not just with information, but with provocation.” As a result, the designers decided “ Animals Like Us” and its program would be designed “so that the guests control the program flow, and so that exploration is valued equal to or more than information”(personal communication, December 3,2013).
Designing a cart for a zoo setting proved to have its own challenges.  In this space, there are many stimuli competing for attention – sights, sounds, smells, flavors.  In order to become its own space in a place like this, a program cart has to be colorful and loud and inviting all on its own.  “Animals Like Us” was created for the Lincoln Park Zoo with these qualities in mind, offering colorful and large signs, real animal skulls for visitor engagement, and a life-size human model standing adjacent to it.  This cart has no problem maintaining its own space.
“What resulted from our probing questions [in the design process] is a cart that, since its unveling, has captivated everyone from the 5 year-old to the 95 year-old, first-time visitors and long-time trustees,” Price says (personal communication).  Indeed, data supported Price’s findings.  A 2013 study conducted by the Garibay Group on program carts at the Lincoln Park Zoo (including “Animals Like Us”),  reported that, “on a scale from 1 to 4 (1 being ‘disagree strongly’ and 4 being ‘agree strongly’), 149 of 150 respondents rated their agreement with the statement ‘We really enjoyed our experience at the station’ as a 3 or 4” (2013).  Research typically focuses on quantitative data about what visitors learned, but it is important to note that this particular study also takes enjoyment into account.  Enjoyment is not often cited as a reason for what people get out of a visit to a museum or zoo, but this evaluation strongly emphasized that “visitors enjoyed their experiences at the stations,” primarily because there was learning involved.  While visitors often cited “enjoying the hands-on or interactive nature of the stations,” the most common response “concerned enjoying information conveyed during the interaction” (Garibay Group, 2013). 
A big idea in a small package? That is exactly what an exhibit cart is. Load it up and cruise the halls and galleries of your museum until you find an audience. It’s a possibility worth imagining because intentional design can work! It’s not only a fix--refocusing a message or reengineering interactivity--it’s about setting out and intending to capture that ‘instant’ of initial human interest and managing that moment as it unfolds and grows into a genuine experience.  Further, that experience can generate a memory of a great museum visit.

The key to program carts’ success rests in remaining flexible making a commitment to anticipate change through audience research, and then adapting as needed to meet the visitor’s mind, senses and spirit. One measure of success is reflected in the higher numbers of participation and stay-time by visitors. Whether adults, families, or children in school groups, all audiences are showing an increasing willingness to draw on their own sense of wonder and curiosity as they investigate, analyze and interpret new museum content designed with them in mind. Carts are succeeding because they invite all visitors to participate equally in a process of direct exchange and discovery.  The result: carts are effective because they engage people via the combination of live programmers and the common interactive space of the cart. Carts aren’t just visitor-centered, they are people powered. In a nutshell, carts WHEEL VISITORS IN.

Monday, March 24, 2014

A Trip to the Ukrainian Institute of Modern Art

The exterior of the UIMA

Walking to the Ukrainian Institute of Modern Art in Chicago, all you can see are Ukrainian flags--waving in the wind off the porches of homes, hanging in the windows of businesses, even oddly positioned out of apartment buildings just so that they can be seen.  As the UIMA is located in the heart of the city's Ukrainian Village, this would normally not be such an unusual thing (in the city of neighborhoods that is so prone to local pride)... Except that there are so many of them, everywhere.  Along with the flags in many of these windows, there are signs (also in the shape and design of the Ukrainian flag) that read 'United We Stand for Ukraine.'  Clearly going beyond simple neighborhood pride, these flags and signs present a powerful political message.  In wake of the political turmoil overseas, this local neighborhood is quietly and strongly offering support of the Ukrainian peoples.

It is odd, then, to arrive at the UIMA museum and find no such mention or display of the Revolution.  An institution for Ukrainian culture, modern art, and experience in Chicago since 1971, the Ukrainian Institute of Modern Art Chicago is one place you might expect to see something, anything regarding the current political events.  Even though there were no flags hanging boldly, no "United We Stand" signs displayed, no message to the public, the museum quietly spoke volumes on the subject nevertheless.  

There are two galleries here--one side gallery housing the museum's Permanent Collection, and the main gallery housing the special Exhibits--the current one being "Survival, Spirits, Dreams, Nightmares" (at least until the end of the month).  The Permanent Collection is comprised of contemporary works made in Chicago or by artists with both ties to Chicago and the Ukraine.  Though small, this gallery had a strong lineup of items from the Permanent Collection (numbering over 900 objects in total), including "Luke 1:35" by Lialia Kuchma.  Referencing the Annunciation of the birth of Jesus to Mary, Kuchma's beautiful blue and yellow tapestry can be seen (kinda) pictured below, toward the left of the photo of the gallery.  Here's a better look at the work here: http://uima-chicago.org/artwork/luke-135/.  Given the color scheme, this work is the closest object in the museum resembling the Ukrainian flag, but was just one of many items representing the Ukrainian heritage.

The side gallery featuring works from the museum's Permanent Collection


In the main gallery, the special exhibit "Survival, Spirit, Dreams, Nightmares" seemed not to have any ties to that heritage--at first.  While all four artists Rene Hugo Arceo, Mark Nelson, Yohanon Petrovsky-Shtern and Peter Dallos have Chicago ties (or, had, as UIMA bills Dallos as an "ex-Chicagoan), this link was not made obvious in the museum (and was completely unbeknownst to the writer).  Each artist clearly speaks from a unique cultural background. Arceo's linocut prints of elements of traditional Mexican culture are vastly different from Dallos' struggle-themed sculptures.  Petrovsky-Shtern's "Nightmare"-ish acrylics on canvas depict worlds and places disparate from those in Nelson's acrylics.  But in a second trip around the gallery, looking at each work again with a "big picture" lens, the ties to Ukrainian heritage and current conflict became apparent.

"Family."  Yohanan Petrovsky-Shtern. 2012.
The label posits: "Human beings secure their own freedom and independence by using the wreckage of the previous slavery as building blocks.  In doing so, are they protecting or enslaving themselves?"


The purpose of this exhibit, as per the UIMA, is to ultimately feature the "power of the human spirit in overcoming adversity" in these works.  Though from geographically and culturally different perspectives unrelated to Ukraine, these works offer glimpses of the Ukrainian experience of the current struggle in the face of unrest. While this is most likely a matter of the timing of the exhibit coinciding with the unrest overseas, "Survival, Spirit, Dreams, Nightmares" nevertheless feels extremely relevant to the Revolution, prompting questions into the influences and the emotions involved in the Ukrainian revolution.  Can Dallos' "Struggle" sculptures be used to depict the conflict between the Soviets and the Ukrainian people now?  Do the questions Petrovsky-Shtern raise in his "Family" painting apply to the Ukrainian Revolution?  


Sticking to its mission statement in presenting "contemporary art as a shared expression of the Ukrainian and American experience," the Ukrainian Institute of Modern Art wisely uses these varied works to offer a quiet, powerful reflection on what the Ukrainian experience might currently feel like in the distress it now faces.  

Monday, February 24, 2014

Getting Back in the Swing of Things







Last week, winter finally got to me.  I was officially over the snow and the drab and the traffic and the hibernating, so I decided to take a trip to the Art Institute of Chicago for some inspiration.  I was losing brain cells from the consistent winter schedule of running home to sweatpants and Netflix binges, so I needed an intellectual change.  En route to turning this new leaf, I of course encountered more snow, traffic, and cold temperatures, again tempting me to be deterred from making it to AIC, or any place other than straight to my bed.  I suffered through the 1:45 minutes’ worth of traffic to finally arrive downtown, but unfortunately this epic poem of getting to the museum did not end there.

Having reserved a parking spot online in a nearby garage, I made my way over to the Adams and Wabash area.  Not having fully read the instructions or directions that came with the parking reservation, however, I ended up in the wrong garage.  This mistake took all of 2 minutes for me to realize, and still cost me $12.00 to correct.  Aggravated and not feeling so well, I eventually--finally--walked the few blocks from the proper garage to AIC—and believe me, the cold temperature that day became more refreshing than annoying by this point in my trip.

Busts of Silenus (Busts Fashioned in the Shape of Silenoi)
The Art Institute looked a little light on exhibits that day.  “The Production Line of Happiness” seemed to be the only exhibit among the empty galleries in the Modern Wing, which I didn’t stick around for (there was a lot of reading involved and I wasn’t in the mood).  So back to the main building, I headed over to the Chagall America Windows, and just stood there basking for a bit in the blue glow. Then I walked through the hall of Greek and Roman art, admiring how these Silenus busts of ugly drunken spirits (pictured) do so closely resemble the drunks littering Clark street day in and day out.  And so on I went to one of the newer exhibitions, “When the Greeks Ruled Egypt.”  The history of Ancient Egypt has a special place in my heart, so I made sure to spend time here reading and learning.   Before going home, I decided to make a trip to my favorite spot in the entire museum, the Sculpture Court.  I enjoy the quiet and the lighting there, so it was good I got a calming fix in before my somewhat traumatic experience in the American Modern galleries upstairs.

I will reiterate that I was not feeling well this day, and was also a little out of it.  Eventually the AIC was able to turn my aggravation of the day into a sort of absorbent daze as I looked at the different works of art.  So, still in this daze, I happen upon my favorite Ivan Albright paintings (That Which I Should Have Done and Did Not Do and Picture of Dorian Gray), admiring the incredible detail and skill, and floating over to other interesting paintings.  At this point, mid-float, I noticed that my giant purse was touching the metal low rail protecting the painting, so I tried to avoid that happening and moved in a way that my knee instead made contact with the metal low rail, so much so that it knocked it to the ground (out of the floor it had been securely screwed into).  There was a clatter of metal banging, and I sort of stood there for a moment in disbelief before slyly looking around the gallery to see if anyone had noticed (one man did, and told me it would be better to leave the items where they fell).  Fortunately a security guard was not there to witness in person, although one did quickly come into the room surveying the situation.  Upon hoofing it the hell out of that gallery and heard the discrepancy being reported over a walkie-talkie, I noticed that a section of American Modern was empty and roped off for construction. 


The Hippodrome, London by Everett Shinn (aka the painting that lured me into defacing the low rail)

As I walked through the familiar-yet-favorite Indian and Himilayan art in Alsdorff Galleries, I realized that the emptiness and construction I saw in the Modern American and Modern Wings did not bother me so much after all.  Despite the bruise from my mishap upstairs and the headache I had been combating that day, I was still able get a fulfilling trip out of seeing my favorite spots and pieces in the museum.  Although I may have seen the Chagall Windows and Dorian Gray a hundred times already, they never cease to amaze me.  Their color and detail were more than I had seen in all the three months of being buried under the snow.  And I even found a new favorite painting--even though it may have led me to deface the museum.  Leaning in to watch that circus performer swing from the ceiling of The Hippodrome, knocking into the low rail, might have been just the kick I needed to get back on track.  I left AIC feeling satisfied, on to finish the epic poem of getting home and into those sweatpants.  


-Jessica

Monday, August 12, 2013

Feces Save Species


 
Last December (here) we introduced you to Amanda Berlinski and her 'Eureka' moment as she worked with Museum Explorer to develop the concept for the Lincoln Park Zoo POOP cart. Well that A-Ha moment has turned into a reality and to the delight of hundreds of visitors to the Zoo.
 
The cart, now called Feces Save Species, helps visitors learn why its so important for scientists working at the Zoo to roll up their sleeves and sink their hands into piles of crap every single day--dung of every size, shape and weight. By examining what comes out of the 'business end' of animals, Zoo scientists can monitor their health. They observe it, identify it, process it and analyze it!  WOW what a load of work!

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Museum Explorer WELCOMES Leslie Goddard!

Leslie is a talented historian and public speaker with an IMPRESSIVE resume and range of knowledge.  Her newest endeavor will be to assist MuseumX on a historical museum project, and we couldn’t be more pleased to have her.  Check out her introduction below!

When I wake up, I don’t always know who I’ll be that day.

Sometimes it’s Amelia Earhart. Or Clara Barton. Sometimes I’m Jackie Kennedy [in the photo above, for example].

Assuming different identities is part of what I do as a history performer. It involves lots of research, shopping for vintage goodies, and wearing fabulous gowns. But most importantly it involves creating an experience that is both fun and informative for an audience.

Now, bear with me. But acting bears a lot of similarity to working in a museum.

Like a great interpretation, a great museum exhibition should be both entertaining and educational. It should connect with what the audience already knows and understands. It needs to convey information, of course, but it should also be fun to experience and easy to understand. When a visitor leaves a great museum exhibition, they should be inspired to think about the topic more, maybe even want to learn more after the experience ends.

I began working in museums in 2002 because I love this kind of learning – stimulating, self-directed, and intimately connected to everyday life. After receiving degrees in English (Stanford University) and History (Northwestern University), I pursued a Museum Studies Master’s Degree from the University of Leicester in Great Britain. In the ten years I’ve been working in museums, I have developed exhibitions and lectured on a wide range of historical and cultural topics. A sampling of my projects and thematic exhibitions includes A Great War Enthusiasm: Evanston and the Civil War (Evanston History Center), Steelroots (The Morton Arboretum), Vanishing Acts: Trees Under Threat (The Morton Arboretum), Jens Jensen: Landscapes for People (Sterling Morton Library), and Sweet Home Chicago: A History of the Candy Capital of America (Elmhurst Historical Museum). I have led concept development, conducted research, written exhibition labels, and developed interpretation for museums ranging from an outdoor arboretum serving 800,000 visitors annually to a historic house serving 14,000 visitors each year. I have served on the board of the Illinois Association of Museums and the advisory board of the Illinois State Historical Society.


When you work in the museum world, you never know what kind of fascinating, challenging project will pop up next. This time around, I’ll be working with Museum Explorer to research and write interpretive labels for an exhibition exploring Elmhurst’s history and culture through the voices of people who have lived there. Who knows what fascinating themes and intriguing characters will emerge from the museum’s impressive collection of journals, newspapers, photographs, maps, and other treasures. But whatever does emerge, I know I’ll be striving to make something meaningful and memorable. And I’ll always try to leave them wanting more.

Thursday, June 6, 2013

You Are Here!



Even if you don't know where you are right now, your phone probably does (or your car, or your tablet…or some other device). You're pin-pointed by a global positioning system that tracks your lifestyle whether you're driven or drifting. That GPS has got its 'eye' on you. 

So...how about an alternative: not knowing where you are and not knowing where you're going and not caring. Sound frightening, or liberating? Summer is a great time to visit a museum or zoo or aquarium or garden and simply wander around. Enjoy the freedom of simple 'exploration'! Make the summer of 2013 a time of discovery. Get out and visit. Keep your phone and or iPad in your purse or pocket while you’re there. Don't even read the signs. Just stroll, mosey, sashay or even slither if you like from painting to painting, case to case or animal to animal. Rediscover what it means to just be somewhere!

Monday, March 11, 2013

One-Stop-Shop: "Tours" at The Art Institute Chicago



A few weeks ago, the Art Institute of Chicago debuted a new app—“Art Institute Tours.”  It offers visitors who download on their smartphones (Apple or Android) a concise key to the museum, including small museum-curated tours, organized by Period, Movement, country, and so forth.  The app also offers a step-by-step directional feature precisely guiding the go-ers to any specific work, sort of a condensed version of their “Pathfinder” and “Floor Plan” features available on their website.

One of the best features of “Tours” is the Tours by Theme option, organizing tours by associating pieces together by very unique, specific commonalities.  This particular method of cataloging offers a unique option to students especially looking for a specific theme to study in the collection-beyond just medium, style, period, etc--although there are good tours organized according to those traditional standards as well.  For example: “Look a Little Closer,” and “My Kind of Town” were especially intriguing.  The “Closer” tour leads you to pieces in the museum with interesting, often overlooked details.  My favorite tour was “My Kind of Town.” As a Chicagophile, I love that song, love this city, and loved learning little factoids about Chicago through the few pieces of art included in this tour.  As someone who has visited the Art Institute many, many times, I think this particular Themed tours feature is of great use and interest to a regular/frequent visitor looking for something new amid the familiar setting.  The collection is certainly large enough to spend hours and days studying and observing.  This app provides a way to organize those visits with the ability to easily discover new pieces or spaces within the museum.

One thing that was very clear on this technology-led tour of the AIC was the modernization of the museum itself—via technology, of course.  “Art Institute Tours” is not the only motion the AIC has taken toward technological friendliness and development.  Other vestiges beyond “Tours” include: interactive computer screens, as well as tower/monitor computer stations, scattered around the museum within exhibits, and in public spaces to help people with step-by-step directions throughout the museum, with more info about an exhibit or piece of work; free wi-fi available to all visitors; as well as a recently re-vamped website with a sleek design that promotes the use of icons and simplicity.  But while these recent infiltrations of technology are present all through the museum, it is not an ostentatious show.  None of it is shocking. 

In fact, it seems like a natural extension.  It's possible you might not notice it if you didn't know to look for it. Advertising about it wasn't very ostentatious at the entrances.  This was also the release date of the Picasso and Chicago exhibit, however, so I suppose it was a bit overshadowed. Maybe you didn’t expect it—or maybe you did—but once you see these computers hanging up on the wall, once you notice that prompt for app download on your smartphone, it just…makes sense.  Why shouldn’t they offer wi-fi to the visitors?  Everyone else does.  Soon even the public parks might offer wi-fi! 

But—beyond being an idea born of necessity/inevitability—is this co-existence of technology and art also a nod to aesthetic appeal of technology? Aesthetically the sleek technology placed against the neoclassical architecture (in the main building, anyway) by the works of art just worked. That big beautiful screen looked so nice on the wall.   This is Apple-specific for this location, of course—because every medium that was provided by the Museum was Apple-made.  But it was hard not to notice that the outfits of technology complimented the exhibits they were situated in.  For instance, there are two computers and monitors stationed right across from Marc Chagall’s America Windows, placed there to provide the opportunity to learn more about the work.  This station was being used for this purpose by multiple people the whole time I was near these windows.  It was tucked away in a nook, but it still managed to compliment the windows in a way.  The dim glowing from the blue Mac screens against the white walls did not look unlike the “Windows.”  And in Picasso and Chicago, the rectangular interactive touch-screen computers were hung up right beside Picasso’s works of art in frames of that very shape.  Is this a stylistic choice?

In any case, the AIC is now encouraging a one-stop shop environment—shopping, dining, social media, easy digital access at your fingertips—all occurring within their location.  Many of these things they already offered before, but are now more rounded out with the new technological involvement.  It is officially a hub!  But this does not take away from the museum itself.  They have created a good app and a good opportunity for visitors to further delve into the building, into the collection, into the very works of art themselves. Art is meant to stimulate the five senses so that the visitor can smell, touch, hear, feel, and (on occasion) taste—EXPERIENCE the work.  And enabling all this sleek technology only further enhances that opportunity the works of art lends.  It is not groundbreaking technology—this is occurring all over.  Museums are inevitably moving into this direction of incorporating more and more technology into their facilities. While a natural step forward, it is a graceful one.